Although the article states that "Democrats say the government could save money if it used its massive purchasing power to negotiate with pharmaceutical companies," there is little evidence to support their claim.
First, it's not clear that allowing the government to negotiate prices would yield any savings. According to a recent report from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, "Government price negotiation would not yield lower drug prices compared to current law."
Second, Democrats cite the Department of Veterans Affairs' drug benefit as a good model for Medicare Part D. But under the VA model, drug companies must sell their products to the government at a price that is at least 24% less than the non-federal average manufacturer's price. In other words, the VA institutes price controls.
Medicare covers well over 40 million seniors. If price controls are extended to such a large segment of the market, they inevitably would result in reduced consumer choices and stifled drug innovation.
PETER PITTS
Director, Center for Medicine in the Public Interest,
New York
Featured
Animal health and human health are inextricably linked
May 15, 2012
Drug Shortages and the Role of the Middle Man
April 13, 2012
Obamacare's Medical Mercenaries
April 13, 2012
Social Networks
Receive latest news & event updates
Provide email below:
Like CMPI on Facebook
Follow CMPI on Twitter
Connect with CMPI on LinkedIn
Watch our Videos on CMPI YouTube Channel
Subscribe to Receive CMPI RSS Feeds
Donate
Please consider a tax-deductible contribution to CMPI. Your support is appreciated.